NOMI Dashboard
← Back to Samposhyam.org

Sundarbans Benchmark Dataset

Interactive exploration of the NOMI framework validation data

DEMO MODE — Anonymized Data
317
Codes
19
Themes
473
Relationships
4,533
Evidence
45%
Cross-Pillar
Overview
Pillars
Relationships
CoE Scores
AMRP

Pillar Distribution

NSS (89)
OR (76)
MLE (79)
IK (73)

Near-perfect pillar balance (Shannon evenness: 0.99). 317 unique codes distributed across 4 pillars from 44 respondents in Gosaba and Patharpratima blocks, Indian Sundarbans.

Key Metrics

MetricValueInterpretation
Code Density7.20317 codes / 44 respondents
Relationship Density1.49473 relationships / 317 codes
Evidence Depth9.584,533 evidence records / 473 relationships
Modularity (Q)0.770Strong community structure (Louvain)
Cross-Pillar Rate45%213 of 473 relationships cross pillars

Nutritional & Salinity Stress (NSS)

89 codes exploring how salinity intrusion and climate exposure compromise nutritional security.

ThemeCodesRelationships
T01: Salinity-Nutrition Nexus1832
T02: Water Security1528
T03: Dietary Diversity1424
T04: Climate-Food Pathways1221
T05: Agricultural Stress1119

Observational Resilience (OR)

76 codes examining supply chain infrastructure and adaptive capacity under climate stress.

Multi-Lens Equity (MLE)

79 codes analyzing economic dimensions including market dynamics and livelihood resilience.

Indigenous Knowledge (IK)

73 codes documenting traditional ecological knowledge and community-based food safety strategies.

Cross-Pillar Relationships (213 of 473)

FromToCountDirection
NSSOR58Bidirectional
NSSMLE42Bidirectional
NSSIK31Bidirectional
ORMLE37Bidirectional
ORIK24Bidirectional
MLEIK21Bidirectional

Convergence of Evidence (CoE) Distribution

171
Strong
302
Moderate
0
Weak

CoE computed using Shi et al. (2025) methodology adapted for qualitative CQT framework. 4,533 evidence records from peer-reviewed literature validate 473 relationships.

AMRP (Adaptive Metric Recalibration Protocol) compares a new site's NOMI analysis against the Sundarbans benchmark to identify methodological strengths and gaps.

Benchmark Profile

DimensionSundarbans ValueInterpretation
Code Density7.20High saturation
Cross-Pillar Rate0.45Strong integration
Pillar Balance0.99Near-perfect evenness
Relationship Density1.49Rich connectivity
Evidence Depth9.58Thorough triangulation
Modularity (Q)0.770Strong community structure
CoE Strong Rate0.053Top-tier evidence

How to Use AMRP

Run nomi-apply amrp-diagnose on your project to compare your site's metrics against this benchmark. The diagnostic radar chart highlights dimensions where your analysis may need strengthening.